DownsizeDC.org
October 24, 2011
Protecting Your Online Privacy
By James Wilson

Last Friday, October 21, marked the 25th anniversary of the signing of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA). This law is hopelessly outdated and fails to protect your online privacy from government snooping.

That is why I sent the following letter using DownsizeDC.org's Hands Off the Internet campaign.

The hard-wired message says, "Please oppose any attempts to undermine Internet freedom."

I added these personal comments, which you may borrow from or copy...

The Justice Department is undermining Internet freedom by exploiting gaps in the outdated Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA). ECPA must be updated to require search warrants for The State to . ..

* access documents stored online
* acquire location information from mobile phones

ECPA might have been well-intentioned when it passed in 1986. It did not, however, anticipate the World Wide Web or the widespread use of email and mobile devices.

One result, as New York Times reported earlier this year, is that Internet and telecommunications companies are "dealing with a patchwork of confusing standards that have been interpreted inconsistently by the courts, creating uncertainty." (http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/10/technology/10privacy.html)

This uncertainty is a danger to our liberties...

* The Justice Department has argued that cellphone users had given up the expectation of privacy about their location by voluntarily giving that information to carriers
* It also argued that it ought to have access to some e-mails without a search warrant
* In many cases, the government does not notify people that they are searching their online information or prove probable cause
* If the government violates the law in obtaining information, defendants are generally unable to exclude that evidence from a trial

The Justice Department's position is absurd.

It is true that individuals often consensually give private information to cellphone carriers and Internet providers, just as they give OTHER private information to . . .

* banks
* doctors
* spouses or best friends

But should their bank account information be shared with strangers?

Should their medical records be handed over to neighbors and friends?

Of course not! Voluntarily giving SOME personal information to other private parties does NOT mean that The State is also entitled to that information!

The State is NOT entitled to know:

* My whereabouts
* Personal information about me
* Or private communications from me

This is true whether the information is on paper, in a hard drive, or in cyberspace. The First and Fourth Amendments protect them all.

Moreover, Congress should view the search warrant NOT as an obstacle, but as a neceesary TOOL for effective law enforcement. By requiring an impartial judge to give consent before officials can search my private property, a search warrant...

* Prevents harrassment of innocent individuals or political opponents
* Prevents the accumulation of meaningless data which can misdirect, not help, investigations
* And focuses investigations toward actual criminal wrongdoing, not vaguely "suspicious" activity

A warrant is required if the government wants to search my file cabinet, OR my doctor's file cabinet. It should ALSO be required if the government wants me, my ISP, or my mobile carrier to access my private information. Please update ECPA to protect our privacy in the Internet Age.

END LETTER

You can send your letter using DownsizeDC.org's Eduate the Powerful System.

You are not alone in this effort. Senators Wyden, Kirk, and Leahy are offering promising bills. And the Electronic Frontier Foundation is actively promoting this cause.

By participating and spreading the word, you will help achieve a victory.

And you can help expand the Downsize DC reach, today. The DownsizeDC.org Facebook page is just 20 fans away from 11,000. Become a fan today, and share with others.

Jim Babka
President
DownsizeDC.org, Inc.

P.S. Reminder, I will be returning to the airwaves, Wednesday, 2:06 PM Eastern, on the Accent Radio Network, with special guest, Judge Andrew Napolitano of the Fox Business Channel.

Blog commenting is currently under construction. In the meantime, you can send an email if there's something you'd like to tell us.

What Can We Do For You?

We can help you downsize the federal government, if you want that. All you have to do is join. It's free! In return...

We'll give you an army.

We're recruiting a huge army of supporters to work for what you want.

We'll give you influence.

The Downsize DC Army will exert relentless, resistance-numbing pressure on Congress.

We'll make your voice heard.

We'll use our growing army to make your beliefs heard by everyone, everywhere, every day.

We'll give you winning strategies.

Ideas like our "Read the Bills Act" and the "One Subject at a Time Act" will give you the leverage to win the public debate, control Congress, and Downsize DC!

We'll give you powerful tools.

  • Your free membership includes a subscription to our free email newsletter, the Consent Chronicle, which national talk show host Jerry Hughes calls by far the best newsletter he receives.
  • You'll be able to use our Educate the Powerful SystemSM to pressure Congress. It's easy. All it takes is a few mouse clicks and keyboard strokes. You can do it in your bathrobe while you're drinking your morning coffee, or during a break at work.
  • You'll also gain access to our 16-page strategy document, "The Downsize DC Vision." You'll learn about important insights like "ignoring an axiom," and powerful strategies like "picking off the herd." One reader called this document "the unified field theory" of political change.

To gain these benefits, just enter your email address in the box below and hit Subscribe!

Subscribe to the Consent Chronicle
Enter your email address twice: